Problem Statement

flutter flutter

Continuous deployment cycles increase the risk of breaking existing features

In Agile development environments, where builds are deployed frequently, rapid changes increase the risk of introducing issues that may break existing functionality. Relying on manual regression testing in such scenarios is highly inefficient and impractical—especially when hundreds of test cases must be executed repeatedly throughout the development cycle.

flutter flutter

Excessive time consumption during UAT

In the absence of automated scripts, all test execution during UAT must be conducted manually—resulting in excessive time consumption, escalates workload and stress, This manual burden becomes critical when changes or bug fixes require repeated regression cycles.

company employee image

Solution


Initiate the test automation strategy

check_box

Implementation (A)

Set up the test automation framework at the early stages of development

  • IT project of medium to large complexity, featuring 500+ to thousand of test cases.
  • Best for Agile methodology with continuous deployment. Also suitable for Iterative Development.
  • Long and lengthy project timeframe.

check_box

Implementation (B)

Deploy the test automation framework prior the UAT phase

  • IT project of small to medium complexity, featuring less than 300 test cases.
  • Best for Waterfall methodology and suitable for any SDLC methodology (model).
  • Best for short project timeframe.

Primary Objectives

Initiating test automation early ensures early bug detection, prevents breaking existing features, supports agile rapid deployment, and reduces repetitive manual testing—resulting in faster delivery, improved quality, and reduced development risks.

In most cases, test automation enhances project results by increasing both speed and reliability

Risks associated with the absence of test automation

service image
  • Higher Risk of Defects in Production.

    Bugs found late in the cycle are more costly and time-consuming to fix. The late fixes may break the stable features while the full manual regression testing at this point is not possible, thus increasing the risk of defects slipping into the production environment.

    call_made call_made
  • Delayed Project Schedule.

    Manual regression and repetitive testing slow down the project milestones such as development, testing and UAT.

    call_made call_made
  • Poor client impression.

    Delays, frequent bugs re-open, not effective UAT process and inconsistent test results may occur—leading clients to perceive the project as poorly managed, and lacking in quality assurance.

    call_made call_made
  • Increased Testing Cost Over Time

    Requires more testers to perform manual testing and bug validation in order to meet tight deadlines.

    call_made call_made
  • Reduced Tester Morale.

    Repetitive, manual tasks, multi-tasking testing can lead to burnout and decreased motivation among QA staff.

    call_made call_made
Proposal Test Automation

Easy Scripting in Robot Framework

  • It's human-friendly and versatile syntax uses keywords and supports extending through libraries in Python, Java, and other languages.
  • Robot Framework eliminates the need for object-oriented programming, as its predefined keywords simplify complex actions into single, easy-to-use keywords.
Proposal Test Automation

Why Robot Framework ?

1. Open-source automation framework built-on Python supported by a strong community. Rich plugin ecosystem and frequent updates.

2. Reusable and maintainable test scripts.

3. Highly extensible with custom libraries and tools.

4. Keyword-Driven Approach; Uses easy-to-read keyword-driven syntax, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical team members. Support Data-Driven.

5. Ideally suited for acceptance testing (UAT & FAT) and continuous regression testing.

6. Works well across web, mobile, API, database, and desktop applications.

7. Extensive Library Support. Integrates with popular external libraries like SeleniumLibrary, AppiumLibrary, and DatabaseLibrary.

8. Platform and Language Independent. Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux.

9. Integration with CI/CD is easy with tools like Jenkins, GitLab CI, and Azure DevOps.

10. Rich Reporting and Logging. Generates detailed HTML reports and logs after test execution.

Proposal Test Automation

Member of Robot Framework Foundation

  • Development of Robot Framework is funded by the non-profit Robot Framework Foundation. It consists of companies and organizations that want to ensure the continuity of Robot Framework now and in the future.
  • Project is hosted at GitHub.
  • Robot Framework ranks among the top open-source tools for test automation due to its feature-rich, versatility and strength.

TRACK RECORD


shape-image